Mail call mondays season 23/9/2023 ![]() The study began in a tissue culture, then moved to an animal model. In fact, this research made the virus replicate less dangerous.”Ĭorley says the line pulled out of context actually had nothing to do with the virus’ effect on humans. “First, this research is not gain-of-function research, meaning it did not amplify the Washington state SARS-CoV-2 virus strain or make it more dangerous. “We want to address the false and inaccurate reporting about Boston University COVID-19 research, which appeared today in the Daily Mail,” said the BU statement. And the University’s statement strongly denied it. ![]() They wanted to find out if the virus was truly less virulent, says Corley, “simply because it wasn’t infecting the same cells as the initial strain.” They were “interested in what part of the virus dictates how serious of a disease a person will get.”īut Corley says the news reports pulled one line from the paper’s abstract out of context, with the Daily Mail suggesting in its headline that the researchers had created a “deadly Covid strain with an 80 percent kill rate.” The newspaper went on to make a series of other misleading claims, including that the study was “gain of function research,” alleging researchers set out to make a more deadly virus. Researchers were interested in comparing the variant with the original virus strain, known as the Washington strain. The study set out to examine the spike proteins on the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1). Corley, NEIDL director and BU Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine chair of microbiology, of the news reports. “They’ve sensationalized the message, they misrepresent the study and its goals in its entirety,” says Ronald B. ![]() The University also noted that the research was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), which consists of scientists as well as local community members, and that the Boston Public Health Commission had approved the research. The reports, which first appeared on Monday in the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail, claimed researchers at the lab had “created a new deadly COVID strain.” In a statement Monday afternoon, BU called the reporting, which was picked up by other outlets, including Fox News, “false and inaccurate,” and said this research made the virus less dangerous. We’ve added that complete statement, which says that BU “fulfilled all regulatory obligations and protocols” and that “there was no gain of function with this research,” to the end of this article.īoston University is refuting a series of misleading claims about research at the University’s National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories (NEIDL). Editor’s note, October 18: As this ongoing story continued to develop Tuesday, Boston University released a statement addressing reports about its adherence to federal research guidelines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |